Editorial Policy
This is the standard Magnt uses to decide what deserves to be published, indexed, updated, or corrected.
Scope and intent
Magnt publishes practical guidance about photography, profile presentation, dating apps, and online safety. Articles are informational and are not medical, legal, or mental-health advice.
Sources and claims
We prefer primary research, official platform documentation, and clearly identified first-party analysis. Quantitative claims should be linked to a source or labeled as product observations. A percentage is not a promise that every user will see the same result.
Product comparisons
Comparison pages should describe meaningful differences, disclose Magnt's commercial interest, and avoid inventing competitor capabilities, prices, or customer sentiment. Details that can change should be reviewed before material updates.
AI assistance
AI can assist with outlining, editing, and consistency checks. Publication still requires human review for relevance, factual coherence, unsafe advice, duplication, and whether the page adds value beyond a template.
Updates and corrections
Published and updated dates describe the article record, not an automatic freshness claim. Scheduled drafts remain outside the search index until their publication date. Readers can report an error by email; material corrections are reviewed and the page's modified date is updated when appropriate.
Report a correction
Email iamamrit27@gmail.com with the page URL, the claim in question, and a supporting source where possible.
About Magnt →